Das Ich Denke

Analytische und Systematische Philosophie

Mein Foto
Name:
Standort: Köln, Germany

Samstag, November 25, 2006

Sie fragen, Dr. Peter Singer antwortet

From the Belfast Telegraph

What do you think of the people who are trying to shut down Huntington Life Sciences laboratories?
Don Royal, Kent

I’d like to see HLS shut down, because there has been appalling animal suffering there. But the problem isn’t just HLS, it’s the attitude we have to animals. Factory farming is a much bigger problem - the number of animals suffering there is vastly greater, and everyone who buys factory farm products is responsible for the continuation of that cruelty. So to change that we need to persuade the general public to change their attitude to animals. On that, the tactics used against HLS don’t help. They make the animal movement seem like fanatics, or even worse, terrorists. Our case for animals rests on ethical foundations. When we descend to abuse and harassment, people lose sight of that.

Where should one draw the line between legitimate and illegitimate direct action?
Alastair Banton, London

I support civil disobedience, in the tradition of Gandhi and Martin Luther King. I also support animal activists who trespass to document animal abuse and rescue animals who are suffering or dying. I do not support the use of violence or intimidation.

Isn’t it contradictory to ascribe human-based rights to animals? Surely it is absurd to apply a purely human concept to an animal who has no hope of ever understanding such a thing?
Zaki Nahaboo, London

Not at all. Anyone who ascribes rights to babies or humans with intellectual disabilities must be willing to attribute rights to beings who can’t understand the concept. It’s the moral agents, the ones who are acting, who need to understand the concept. Those to whom we attribute rights, do not need to understand these concepts.

Why should we assign rights to animals when we already recognise duties (of care, preservation of their species, etc) towards them? If animals have a right to life, for example, must we protect them against natural predators in the wild?
Franco Fubin, Cambridge

Unfortunately, we don’t come anywhere near fulfilling the duties we have to animals. If we did, we wouldn’t be bringing misery to the lives of millions of factory farmed animals, for no reason except that we prefer the taste of their flesh to other, cruelty-free and sustainable ways of feeding ourselves. As for protecting prey from predators, if we did that we would be upsetting the ecological system, and the prey would soon become too numerous and starve.

Should we force dogs and lions to stop eating meat?
Michael Gaylard, Bangkok, Thailand

Dogs who live with us, we don’t need to feed meat, and they can do fine without it. Lions, no - I’ve already answered this.

You have argued we should not eat other animals but you draw a line at the oyster. How do you know oysters aren’t sentient?
Nic Riley, London

They don’t have a brain orcentral nervous system, so it is hard to imagine that they can feel pain. But if you have doubts about it, don’t eat them.

Do you have any pets?
Matthew Brown, New York

No.

Would turning to a vegan/vegetarian diet be a first step towards restoring our moral well-being?
Nitin Mehtan, Croydon

I’m more interested in the consequences of that change than in our moral well-being. Going veggie is a very important step, both for what it does for the animals, and what it does to reduce pressure on the environment. It has also been shown to be the single most effective thing that the average person can do to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

I would like to be a vegetarian but I hate nuts, tofu and vegetables. Any tips?
Carl Reid, Edgware

Tofu and nuts are good sources of protein, but assuming you’re an adult - and from your name, I’d guess you are not pregnant or breast-feeding - you don’t need to worry too much about protein. You’ll get enough if you eat bread, rice, potatoes and pasta. Eat lots of fruit for fibre and vitamins. For the same reason, go for wholemeal bread and pasta where you can, and brown rice.

If you were starving and meat was the only sustenance available, would you eat it?
Lily Wilson, Wexford, Ireland

Yes. Everything depends on the consequences. Eating meat because you like the way it tastes is totally different from eating it to survive.

What’s the most effective retort I can use when criticised for being a vegetarian?
David Bradford, Surrey

Try asking them why they are not vegetarian.

You have said that if you had to decide between shooting 10 healthy cows and one healthy human you would have a difficult choice, Why?
Flora Hamilton, Edinburgh

I never said that. On the contrary, I’ve written that it is much worse to kill a being who is aware of having a past and a future, and who plans for the future. Normal humans have such plans, but I don’t think cows do. And normal humans have family and friends who will grieve their death in ways more vivid and longer-lasting than the way cows may care about other cows. (Although a cow certainly misses her calf for a long time, if the calf is taken from her. That’s why there is a major ethical problem with dairy products.) If I really had to make such a decision, I’d kill the cows.

In many parts of the world dogs roam free and are sterilised by animal welfare groups. Would it be less cruel to euthanise them? And are dogs confined in homes - often alone all day - any better off than dogs taking their chances on the streets?
Cindy Milburn

Dogs are pack animals, and shouldn’t be left alone all day. I’m not opposed to euthanasia in some circumstances, but if the dogs are doing all right on their own, it’s better to sterilise them and set them free again.

Are zoos immoral?
Janise Schuler, Greenwich

Most of them are, because they confine animals for our amusement in ways that are contrary to the interests of the animals. But if zoos really put the interests of the animals first, and only then find ways for us to observe them, they are not immoral.

Did caring for your mother as she developed Alzheimer’s change your views about the propriety of terminating the lives of young children with severe mental retardation?
Leila Morrison, Bath

No.

Would you kill a disabled baby?
Karen Meade, Dublin

Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole. Many people find this shocking, yet they support a woman’s right to have an abortion. One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that, from the point of view of ethics rather than the law, there is no sharp distinction between the foetus and the newborn baby.

How does it feel to be compared to a Nazi given your grandparents died in the Holocaust?
Ella Ljunggren, London

It’s offensive and frustrating. It’s sad that people have so little understanding of either my views, or what the Nazis really believed.

Do you advise people to give a fifth of their income to charity?
Debra Freeman, Perth

I give more than a fifth, nowadays, but I usually suggest that people give 10 per cent. Of course, it all depends on people’s circumstances, but when there are so many people dying from poverty-related causes giving a tenth of our income to organisations such as Oxfam or Unicef seems a for moral decency.

I am in debt (to financial institutions). Should I prolong my debt repayments by contributing towards alleviating poverty, or should I make my repayments and then give to charity?
Mark Morgan, Bath

Maybe you should cut your spending?

Does free will exist and if so, is it restricted to human beings, or can other animals have it?
E Castlee, Brighton

In a deep metaphysical sense, I don’t think free will exists. But we, and some animals, can make choices, and that’s real enough, whatever the causes of our choices.

What is the most immoral thing you have ever done?
Jamie Baxter, Liverpool

Spending too much money on myself when others need it a lot more.

Is it impossible for the human race to reach its potential?
Peter Braham, West Yorkshire

Whatever it’s potential, it’s possible. But don’t ask me if it will actually happen.

Would you say your fundamental ethical principle is that we should attempt to do least harm; and if so, the main problem this raises is knowing how to compare different kinds of harm?
Stephen Morley

No, I think we should try to reduce harm as much as possible, which is different from ourselves doing the least harm. It isn’t easy to compare different types of harm, but we have to do our best.

Are there moral absolutes, if so, what are they and why?
Renae Mann

The only moral absolute is that we should do what will have the best consequences for all those affected by our actions.

Your philosophy seems very heavy. What do you do to chill out?
V J Singh, London

Go hiking and get away from the crowds.

Is your species a plague on the planet?
David Underhill, Alabama

We’ve certainly done a lot of damage to other species, but “plague” isn’t the right term.

How do we deal with people like George Bush, who care nothing for truth or logic in their bid to get their own way?
Julia Iskandar, London

Try to get others to see them this way, so that they’ll be voted out of office.

Thanks largely to your work, utilitarianism is now best known as ” the baby-killing philosophy”. Are you really maximising good consequences with this focus on infanticide?
Richard Penny, Helsinki

I haven’t focused on infanticide. It’s always been a minor aspect of my work. The focus is that of my opponents, and the media.

Animal rights activists are often seen as dirty. How often do you wash?
J Mann, by email

Once a month, whether I need it or not.

You once included Pride and Prejudice in a list of your top ten books. Was Jane Austen a feminist?
Carrie Howard, Manchester

Of course! Do you think Elizabeth Bennet meekly did whatever men told her to do?

Why should I be moral?
Katie Farrell, New York

Well … I’ve written a whole book on that topic How Are We to Live?, but in a single sentence: you’ll find it more fulfilling, in the long run, to contribute to making the world a better place, than to think just of your own interests.

Do you ever live up to your surname and sing?
Wilson Evans by email

Yes, but if my ancestors were really singers, I’d like to know what happened to the staying-in-tune genes.

Labels:

Freitag, November 24, 2006

8. Kongress der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie

Österreichische Gesellschaft für Philosophie
8. Kongress
Gehirne und Personen
Mit einem Schwerpunkt zur Österreichischen Philosophie
7. bis 9. Juni 2007 in Graz

Hauptvortragende:
Ansgar Beckermann (D)
Marcia Cavell (USA)
Sabine A. Döring (GB/D)
Eberhard Schockenhoff (D)
Lutz Wingert (D)
Karl Acham (A)

Call for Papers:
Neben vier Schwerpunktsektionen sind neun weitere Sektionen eingerichtet, die für Vorträge zu allen anderen Themen der Philosophie offen stehen. Die Vorträge in sämtlichen Sektionen sollen nicht länger als 40 Minuten dauern, wobei für die Diskussion mehr als 10 Minuten vorzusehen sind. Für jeden Beitrag muss bis spätestens 28. Februar 2007 ein Abstract im Umfang von maximal 40 Zeilen abgegeben werden.

Schwerpunktsektionen:
(1) Gehirne und Personen I: Theoretische Philosophie
(2) Gehirne und Personen II: Praktische Philosophie - Ethik
(3) Gehirne und Personen III: Praktische Philosophie - Sozialphilosophie
(4) Österreichische Philosophie

Allgemeine Sektionen:
(1) Erkenntnistheorie, Wissenschaftstheorie, Logik und Sprachphilosophie
(2) Philosophie des Geistes
(3) Metaphysik und Ontologie
(4) Religionsphilosophie
(5) Anthropologie
(6) Ästhetik und Kulturphilosophie
(7) Phänomenologie und Hermeneutik
(8) Ethik
(9) Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie

Die Anmeldung mit Vortrag ist bis 28.2.2007 möglich. Die Anmeldung ohne Vortrag ist bis 31.5.2007 möglich. Die Anmeldung wird mit der Einzahlung der Kongressgebühr gültig.

Anmeldeformular und weitere Informationen auf: www.oegp.org./kongress07

Organisation:
Frau Friederike Perry
Tel.: ++43 (0)316 380-2299
E-Mail: oegpkongress07@uni-graz.at

Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christian Hiebaum
Universität Graz
Institut für Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsinformatik
Universitätsstraße 15, A-8010 Graz
Tel.: ++43 (0)316 380-3394
E-Mail: christian.hiebaum@uni-graz.at
Fax: ++43 (0)316 380-693394

Labels:

Mittwoch, November 22, 2006

Putnams 80. Geburtstag mit Kripke, Burge, McDowell u.a.

UCD School of Philosophy
Dublin Ireland
Conference in Honour of Hilary Putnam’s 80th Birthday
March 11-14 2007

Speakers

David Albert (Columbia)
Ned Block (NYU)
Richard Boyd (Cornell)
Tyler Burge (UCLA)
Stanley Cavell (Harvard)
James Conant (Pittsburgh)
Michael Devitt (CUNY)
Hartry Field (NYU)
Juliet Floyd (Boston University)
Paul Franks (University of Toronto)
Warren Goldfarb (Harvard)
Russell Goodman (University of New Mexico)
Christopher Hookway (Sheffield)
Saul Kripke (CUNY)
David Macarthur (University of Sydney)
John McDowell (Pittsburgh)
Yemima Ben-Menahem (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Axel Mueller (Northwestern)
Alva Noë (Berkeley)
Charles Parsons (Harvard)
Hilary Putnam (Harvard)
Ruth Anna Putnam (Wellesley College)
Charles Travis (King’s College London)
Crispin Wright (St. Andrews)

Chairpersons and Commentators

Paul Benacerraf (Princeton)
Alan Berger (Brandeis University)|
Anat Biletzki (Tel Aviv University)
Peter Clarke (St Andrews)
L. Alberto Cordero-Lecca (CUNY)
Yuval Dolev (BUI)
Norma B. Goethe (University of Cordoba, Argentina)
Steven Gross (John Hopkins University)
John Haldane (St. Andrews)
Bob Hale (Sheffield)
Arata Hamawaki (University of Chicago)
Pierre Jacob (Institut Jean Nicod, Paris)
Hilla Jacobson (BUI)
Ofra Rechter (Tel Aviv University)
Mark Wilson (Pittsburgh)


Registration forms, full programme and further information are available
from

http://www.putnamucd.com/

Places may be limited, so early booking is advised.

Labels:

Donnerstag, November 16, 2006

Amerikanische Graduiertenkonferenzen


Rutgers-Princeton Graduate Conference 2007,
10.-11. März 2007 (Deadline: 12. Januar)

philconf@gmail.com

City University of New York, Tenth Annual Graduate
Student Philosophy Conference, April 28, 2007
(Deadline: 15. Januar):
philgradconference@gc.cuny.edu

University of Texas at Austin Graduate Philosophy
Conference, April 27-28, 2007
(Deadline: 2. Februar):
https://webspace.utexas.edu/jtb538/2007.htm


Labels:

Konferenz der Spanischen Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie (SEFA)


Fifth Conference of the Spanish Society for Analytic Philosophy (SEFA-5)
University of Barcelona, 7-9 September 2007
Call for Papers (Deadline for submissions, April 2, 2007)

Main speakers:
Cristina Lafont, Northwestern University
Wolfgang Künne, University of Hamburg
Kendall Walton, University of Michigan

The fifth meeting of the Spanish Society for Analytic Philosophy (SEFA-5) will be held on 7-9 September 2007 at the Faculties of Philosophy and Geography and History of the University of Barcelona. The society welcomes submissions on any philosophical topic, for 30 minutes talks followed by a 10 minutes discussion in either of the official languages of the conference, Spanish and English.

Submissions should consist of a detailed summary of the intended talk (about 1000 words). Summaries are expected to indicate the topic, present the main thrust of the talk, and provide a sketch of the main arguments. Please specify at the beginning of the summary the exact title of the talk, your name and your address and e-mail. Decisions on acceptance will be based on this summary.

Please make sure that the document is in WORD- or rtf-format (either PC or MAC) formatted as follows: page settings DIN A4, all margins 3 cm, font TIMES NEW ROMAN 12 pt, single line spacing, title of the talk in bold, justified and centered. Please print name and address in standard (non-bold). Main text also justified.

Deadline for submissions: April 2nd, 2007.

Selection: All abstracts will be blind-refereed. Efforts will be made to include in the program quality original papers from different philosophical disciplines. Notification of acceptance will be sent by April 30th, 2006.

Programme committee: Daniel Quesada (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), José Díez, Manuel García-Carpintero, Josep Macià, Genoveva Martí, José Martínez, Manuel Pérez Otero, Sven Rosenkranz (Universitat de Barcelona), Max Kölbel (University of Birmingham), Luis Fernández (Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Joan Pagès, David Pineda, Josep Ll. Prades (Universitat de Girona), Juan Acero, Esther Romero (Universidad de Granada), Manuel Hernández (Universidad de Murcia), Dan López de Sa (New York University), Luis Valdés (Universidad de Oviedo), Fabrice Correia (Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona), Jesús Ezquerro (Universidad del País Vasco), Tobies Grimaltos (Universidad de Valencia).

Organizing committee: José Díez, Manuel García-Carpintero, Manuel Pérez Otero. Cristina Roadevin, Luis Robledo (Universitat de Barcelona), Daniel Quesada (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), David Pineda (Universitat de Girona), Lorenzo Baravalle (Universitat Rovira i Virgili).

Information about registration, accommodation, etc., will be available soon on the website of the meeting:
http://www.ub.es/grc_logos/sefa_5

Sponsors: Dirección General de Investigación; Direcció General de Recerca; SEFA; Universitat de Barcelona.

Venue:
Facultats de Geografia i Història i Filosofia
Universitat de Barcelona
Montalegre, 6-8, 4ª planta, porta 4044
08001 Barcelona
Further information:
Manuel García-Carpintero, logos@pcb.ub.es

Labels:

Samstag, November 11, 2006

Die Highlights der letzten Wochen

Kripke-Vorlesung und Diskussion an der CUNY (25. Januar 2006):
http://web.gc.cuny.edu/Philosophy/kripke/kripke_lecture.wmv
http://web.gc.cuny.edu/Philosophy/kripke/kripke_discussion.wmv

Weitere Philosophie-Videos:
http://www.lecturesarchive.com/5819.html
http://ethics.sandiego.edu/video/Catalogue/all.asp
http://www.reitstoen.com/multimedia.php

Philosophie-Dissertationen Online:
https://webspace.utexas.edu/deverj/personal/test/dissertations.html

Chalmers "entdeckt" satirisches Dretske-Paper "wieder":
http://fragments.consc.net/djc/2006/10/ziring_ziderata.html

Labels:

free hit counters
free hit counters